Python list iterator behavior and next(iterator

Python list iterator behavior and next(iterator

SELECT rows based on indefinite number of filters

In that light, it becomes more clear that assigning the result of next(a) to a variable inhibits the printing of its result, so that just the alternate values that the i loop variable are printed. Similarly, making the print statement emit something more distinctive disambiguates it, as well.

Start here for a quick overview of the site

Detailed answers to any questions you might have

One of my stock positions has grown substantially. Should I rebalance my portfolio?

… *dies*. The worst of it is, I can remember mentioning exactly this interpreter behavior to someone perhaps a week ago.

site design / logo 2018 Stack Exchange Inc; user contributions licensed undercc by-sa 3.0withattribution required.rev2018.5.4.30300

It doesnt. The loop printsallof the items in the list, without skipping any.

Noisy Iterated Prisoners Dilemma

I get the same result as @lvc (only on IDLE however, when executed as script I get this))

In what era or tech level in earths history did people have the ability to cross a super-earths ocean 50,000 km wide?

Learn more about Stack Overflow the company

Something is wrong with your Python/Computer.

it is behavior of putting code via interactive shell. If function returns value without being used, interpreter would print it to shell as debug output

What you see is theinterpreterechoing back the return value ofnext()in addition toibeing printed each iteration:

Jon Skeet Answers Your Questions IRL

In other words,next()is working as expected, but because it returns the next value from the iterator, echoed by the interactive interpreter, you are led to believe that the loop has its own iterator copy somehow.

Is there any evidence that Alastor Moody taught the Defense Against the Dark Arts (or any other) class?

So, why doesnextnot appear to advance the iterator in this case?

What the difference between old segwit (3) and new segwit address (bc)?

Cant deep learning models now be said to be interpretable?

Confused about using a password that would take centuries to break

Learn more about hiring developers or posting ads with us

Tested in Python 2.7 and in Python 3+ . Works properly in both

Since theyre printing alternating elements of the original sequence, and its unexpected that the next(a) statement is printing, it appears as if the print i statement is printing all the values.

Where does the D&D concept of a Gnome come from?

If you assign the output ofnext()things work as expected:

What is happening is thatnext(a)returns the next value of a, which is printed to the console because it is not affected.

Deleted 2 days of work and no backup

It behaves the way you want if called as a function:

Arduino Libraries: Declaring variables as public?

I find the existing answers a little confusing, because they only indirectly indicate the essential mystifying thing in the code example:both* the print i and the next(a) are causing their results to be printed.

Join Stack Overflowto learn, share knowledge, and build your career.

This being the case, I would expect:

Stack Overflow for Teams is Now Available

My first thought was that this might happen because the loop callsiteron what it is passed, and this might give an independent iterator – this isnt the case, as we haveiter(a) is a.

What you can do is affect a variable with this value:

How do I convey that a relationship is platonic?

The beguiling thing in answering questions, in general, is being explicit about what is obvious once you know the answer. It can be elusive. Likewise critiquing answers once you understand them. Its interesting…

or printextrainformation to differentiate theprint()output from the interactive interpreter echo:

Why is Windows using CRLF and Unix just LF when Unix is the older system?

How can i make the neck of this deck light

Using asterisk (*) when all fields are required

(One of the existing answers refutes the others because that answer is having the example code evaluated as a block, so that the interpreter is not reporting the intermediate values for next(a).)

to skip every second element: the call tonextshould advance the iterator once, then the implicit call made by the loop should advance it a second time – and the result of this second call would be assigned toi.

interesting. I tried for i in a: next(a) ;print i and thought i would jump to 1 and print 1,3,5,7,9. But still it is 0,2,4,6,8. Why?

I was not aware of this behavior from the interpreter. I am glad that I discovered that before losing a lot of time wondering about it while solving some real problem.

@Inbar Rose Only if you run as script.

a = iter(list(range(10))) for i in a: … print(Printing: .format(i)) … next(a) … Printing: 0 1 Printing: 2 3 Printing: 4 5 Printing: 6 7 Printing: 8 9

SCR (aka thyristor) symbol in TikZ circuit

Maximum number of opcodes for a microprocessor

Discuss the workings and policies of this site

So0is the output ofprint(i),1the return value fromnext(), echoed by the interactive interpreter, etc. There are just 5 iterations, each iteration resulting in 2 lines being written to the terminal.

Why is the difference between these functions constant?

A private, secure home for your teams questions and answers.

By posting your answer, you agree to theprivacy policyandterms of service.

My magic system pays the price by drawing its energy from the future: should that affect luck, heat, or life?

So, advancing the iterator is, as expected, handled by mutating that same object.

Sign uporlog into customize your list.

Leave a Reply